The toilet seat. A symbol of the struggle between the sexes since time immemorial.
IMHO, the seat should be put down after use by us guys when we are in a household where there are women around, its a symbolic way of showing that we respect their presence (and we know we have to respect their presence for various reasons, not the least the TV remote).
The advent of the "perfect" toilet seat has me confused (you know the one, with the slit in the front). I mean, its fine as a unisex idea, but it has been installed progressively into all our public toilets. Now, we KNOW for SURE, that women wont be using these toilet seats, so why should we move away from the traditional "up-or-down" toilet seat?
One argument for the "perfect" toilet seats in male restrooms is that it seems troublesome for guys to lift up the seat when not in use, so why dont we just leave a hole in front so that even with the seat down, we can aim with relative ease. However, as witnessed in many a stained seats, this has a backfiring effect it seems. As it would appear, some men just need much more target practice. Even with the extra firing room, they will cause collateral damage to the rest of the toilet seat.. and the poor guy who actually wants to use the seat.. has to do some serious cleaning up.. (and perhaps disinfecting).
Therefore, i'm all for the "traditional" toilet seats. Yes, the ones that the battle of the sexes wages over, the same one that sparks off divorces.Its a "up-or-down" choice, that way, at least the guy who needs to crap, gets a swift and effective relief.
And for fuck's sake. In the men's restrooms. PLEASE LEAVE THE DAMN SEAT UP.